The Odwalla Affair - Reassessing Corporate Social Responsibility
by Jon Entine
It turns out that Odwalla wasn't the paragon of social responsibility that everyone had thought. Indeed, it was found to be criminally negligent in causing the death of a young girl-and permanent injury of several other children-from E. coli poisoning. This brings up serious questions about what social responsibility really is, whether we are looking for it in the right places, and what we can do to encourage corporations to act in the public interest.
The fall from grace was breathtaking. At its peak of prosperity in 1996, Odwalla, the juice company based in Half Moon Bay, California, was touted as much for its ethical consciousness as for its growth prospects. In the autumn of that year, however, one child died and at least seventy others were injured after drinking Odwalla apple juice tainted by poisonous bacteria. Two years later, after pleading guilty to criminal charges of violating Federal food safety laws and paying $1.5 million, the largest fine ever assessed in a food case by the Food and Drug Administration,1 Odwalla is desperately searching for a suitor to save the company from extinction.
Before all this happened, investors captivated by Odwalla's "socially responsible" reputation had bid up its stock to a triple digit price-to-earnings multiple; today it is deep in red ink. Rather than a brand-marketing success story, it faces the dubious distinction that it "will forever be known as the careless producer of poisoned fruit juice."2
How did things go so wrong? Does the Odwalla case provide insight into how well-meaning executives can better align their socially responsible rhetoric with day-to-day operational challenges?
The Trap of "Good Intentions"
Odwalla produces great tasting juices-premium, and until recently, unpasteurized and fresh. It was run by executives who were not shy about noting their commitment to a more just society. Founder Greg Steltenpohl, who described himself as a former artist, would say that he was "learning to respect the fruit" squeezed to make his juices.3 Such New Age brand positioning helped propel Odwalla to a 30 percent annual growth rate. As with other "socially responsible" high flyers of the early 1990s, including Ben & Jerry's, Tom's of Maine, The Body Shop, and Stonyfield Farm, Odwalla relied upon sympathetic media coverage to burnish its brand.
Steltenpohl also understood how to energize support among the ìsocially responsible" investment community. At the 1996 annual gathering of the Social Investment Forum, a trade group that promotes companies purporting to be more ethical, Steltenpohl talked of his Zen-like approach to business. He was feted as a pioneer.
The buzz on Odwalla was based on the perceived intentions of the company. "We believe that this intense caring will translate into a superior product, giving Odwalla a distinct competitive advantage," read one report by the securities firm Adams, Harkness & Hill.4 "Respecting the fruit means inspecting it to ensure that it is of high quality before being pressed. It means treating the fruit like a living thing and handling it in the most gentle way possible. . . . We believe that no other juice company takes these steps to ensure the quality of its products."
Then reality intruded.
In October 1996, barely a month after this review, and within days of drinking her favorite apple juice, sixteen-month-old Anna Gimmestad's kidneys gave out, her brain became clogged with dead blood cells, her heart faltered, and she died. Her body collapsed because the juice had been contaminated with a strain of bacteria known as E. coli O157:H7.
For years, Odwalla had enjoyed the fruits of its socially responsible reputation. Now came the inevitable test of corporate character. What did the crisis reveal about the company's soul?
By all accounts, the entire company was genuinely shaken by the incident. But the future of Odwalla hung in the balance. It publicly labeled the poisonings a freak occurrence and pulled its juice off store shelves. Like most companies, it had digested the public relations lesson of the Tylenol incident: somberly proclaim "responsibility," whatever that means, and position the company as one of the victims.5 Odwalla immediately brushed aside any culpability, instead pleading guilty to the lesser crime of failing to anticipate the health dangers of unpasteurized apple juice.6
"We were advised through industry experts that we had a safe level," said Steltenpohl. "We didn't test for E. coli because we believed evidence showed it was not found at that acid level."
"Odwalla continuously upgraded its manufacturing process in the period leading up to the incident," added spokesperson Chris Gallagher. "We had a process that we believed wholly effective in producing safe, high-quality juices."7
In other words, Odwalla sidestepped the issue of what it should have known about the health dangers of unpasteurized juice-and when it should have known it. This classic PR positioning struck a sympathetic chord-temporarily-even among families of some victims. "I don't blame the company," said Christy Gimmestad, Anna's devastated mother.
For a time, this ìvictim defense" shifted attention to the never-never land of Odwalla's intentions.8 Well before the facts had been aired, Amy Domini, who is a friend of Steltenpohl's and helped orchestrate his appearance at the Social Investment Forumís conference just a month before the poisonings, stood by her man. "Odwalla has been compared to Johnson and Johnson (Tylenol) in rapid recall and voluntary assumption of blame, and the reporters give management high marks for action," she wrote.9 Odwalla and its public relations firm Edleman Worldwide were soon congratulating themselves.10
There is, of course, no comparison between Odwalla and Johnson and Johnson. Tylenol's manufacturer was the victim of a vigilante. In contrast, and by the juice maker's own admission, it was criminally culpable for negligent safety practices. As James L. Lock of Wichita State University wrote in a case study of the incident, ìOdwalla, Inc. abandoned its soul and negated their corporate mission statement-and it was a complete success." 11
But the initial ìsuccess" evaporated as more behind-the-scenes details became known. Odwalla tried but failed to walk a tightrope of cover-up while positioning itself as an earnest bungler. Its "victim" defense unraveled because of the efforts of an aggressive Seattle attorney who represented six of the victims, chagrined federal health and safety officials, and a reporting team at The New York Times.12
According to Federal investigators, Odwalla had significant deficiencies in its citrus-processing equipment. A year before the incident, the industry had been shaken by an outbreak of salmonella in juice served at Walt Disney World that sickened sixty children and adults. The poisoning offered proof that pathogens could survive in highly acidic products. Company documents indicate that the head of Odwalla's quality assurance, Dave Stevenson, who had recently been hired from Florida, responded by proposing to introduce a chlorine rinse as a crucial backstop against bad fruit. But he was overruled by senior executives who feared chlorine would leave an aftertaste. The company also steadfastly refused to pasteurize, claiming this process altered taste and was unnecessary, even though it had received complaints from customers who had become violently ill from bacterial poisoning.13 Executives decided to rely on acid wash, although the chemical supplier had informed Odwalla that it had killed deadly bacteria in only 8 percent of tests and should not be used without chlorine.14
By summer 1996, former company officials say production demands began to overshadow safety concerns. A contractor warned Odwalla that its citrus-processing equipment was so poorly maintained that it was breeding bacteria in "black rotten crud" and "inoculating every drop of juice you make." Reportedly encouraged by executives, managers brushed aside warnings from an inspector that a batch of apples was too rotten to use-some were decayed, one had a worm-without taking special precautions against contaminants. That batch turned out to be deadly.15
Beyond Good Intentions
Could Odwalla have handled this crisis more responsibly? From a post-poisoning, public relations perspective, the answer is probably "No." Out of ignorance, indifference, or recklessness, it had dealt itself a bad hand, but then played it pretty well. The company pulled suspicious product off shelves, although as any crisis advisor would have told them-and probably did-it had little choice. If it had been more honest off the bat in detailing its compromised safety procedures, the hit to its reputation could have been fatal. Only the most unforgiving critic would expect a company to commit public hara-kiri to atone for sins, no matter how deadly. It chose survival over candor.
For all its past problems, Odwalla seems on the way to upgrading its food handling standards. Whether it can salvage its brand reputation is an open question. It's now just one more niche marketer fighting for share in the ultra-competitive pasteurized juice market. It has been forced to jettison much of its once loyal workforce. In November 1998, it quietly announced the departure of Steltenpohl amid rumors the struggling company is on the block.
So what then can other businesses learn from the ethical conundrums that have consumed Odwalla? Is there a constructive role for brand marketing that relies on promoting the social values and intentions of a company?
By adding a socially responsible dimension to commodity products-shampoo, coffee, juice, toothpaste, ice cream, sneakers-entrepreneurs have discovered that they can increase prices and profits. In the same way that Volvo charges higher prices for its cars because it has convinced consumers that it makes safer vehicles, ìsocially responsible" firms can charge premium prices because consumers believe they are getting more than just a product or service-they willingly pay a bonus to the company for promoting more responsible business practices. A progressive image constitutes an economic asset that allows companies to charge a significant integrity premium for their products. ìIntegrity" becomes part of the brand. That's not to say that the socially responsible rhetoric is all smoke and mirrors, but many companies are richly rewarded far more for image marketing and good intentions than for the quality and value of their products or services.
In the past few months alone, a host of socially responsible companies have encountered threats to their brand image for higher integrity: Levi Strauss savaged its U.S. workforce while announcing it is expanding operations in China, Starbucks struck a marketing deal with tobacco giant Philip Morris' Kraft division to distribute its coffee beans in supermarkets, and sneaker companies scrambled to respond to criticism over pay and safety standards at their overseas factories. Body Shop is shuttering stores and has paid out more than $50 million in settlements to disgruntled franchisees threatening fraud suits. Ben & Jerry's is trying to quell a rebellion among its workers, who are demanding union representation and upset about the closure of the company daycare facility, while Ben Cohen reels from the bankruptcy of Community Products Inc., his once-celebrated project to "save the rainforest through capitalism," which has collapsed in scandal.16
On closer scrutiny, many self-anointed progressive businesses are frequently a land of alchemy where promises are easy to make, workers are sometimes treated with indifference, and environmental "reforms" are frequently window dressing. "So many socially responsible companies have noble corporate philosophies," observes Jon Lickerman, head of social research at the Calvert Group, the largest ethical investment company in the United States, "but mistreat their own employees, vendors, and customers."17
As Odwalla has learned the hard way, corporate social responsibility is evidenced by actions taken before a crisis breaks out, not when scrambling to contain a brand-crushing screw-up. It's the organizational controls and the integrity of top executives and board members that ultimately define corporate culture. That's the real lesson of this fiasco.
What was going on inside Odwalla? Months or even years before the poisonings, there was more than enough reason to suspect that breakneck growth was straining safety controls. Though Odwalla has publicly acknowledged approximately 70 incidents, it submitted an affidavit in one suit admitting to more than 300 cases. Documents indicate that there had also been numerous outbreaks of listeria, which makes E. coli seem like tap water.18
According to a damning recent disclosure, the potential safety problems were apparent enough for the army to reject Odwallaës proposal to sell juices at military commissaries. Just four months before the E. coli poisonings, an Army inspector found unacceptably high bacterial counts in a sample and concluded that the risks of "deterioration or adulteration" posed too high a risk.19
The rejection would never have been known if not for an anonymous tip to Bill Marler, the Seattle lawyer who had filed five of the civil suits against Odwalla.20 He immediately subpoenaed the documents. In response, Odwalla claimed no knowledge of the Army's involvement and stated there were no documents. Not convinced, Marler filed a Freedom of Information Act inquiry. Bingo.
The hidden documents did not sit well with the plaintiffs or the presiding judge. Facing hearings on sanctions against Odwalla and its lawyers for obstruction of justice, the company suddenly settled-for the largest amount ever paid in a civil case involving food poisoning from fresh foods-and, remarkably, for more than the plaintiffs had demanded. "I can say it was very important for us to settle these cases with a positive atmosphere and constructive format of mediation," said Steltenpohl, who had resisted any settlement until the smoking gun surfaced.21
Rethinking Current Standards of Ethical Business
How do companies grow from enthusiastic if reckless adolescents to mature businesses with systems of accountability and governance?
The proliferation of ethical controversies among so-called "socially responsible" brands underscores the need for a new, more verifiable ethical paradigm. Professions of "good intentions" or "social responsibility" are not enough. It might be constructive to venture into territory that those who think of themselves as progressive business thinkers might call taboo-the writings of Milton Friedman, who is frequently caricatured as a "right-wing" capitalist. In a now classic analysis, Friedman endorsed a limited concept of socially responsible business. He concluded that businesses that act in the best interest of shareholders maximize the benefits to all stakeholders:
"There is one and only one social responsibility of business-to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits so long as it stays within the rules of the game, which is to say, engages in open and free competition, without deception or fraud. . . . By pursuing [a person's] own interest, he frequently promotes that of the society more effectually than when he really intends to promote it. I have never known much good done by those who affected to trade for the public good."22
Friedman's cynicism about "trading for the public good" was a paraphrase of Adam Smith's argument that those who trade by the "invisible hand" may contribute more to the public weal than those who claim altruistic motives. Under this thesis, corporate social responsibility is fulfilled by the moral constraints of maintaining open competition, establishing a framework for the rule of law, avoiding deception, and exemplifying fair play.
"Most of the talk has been utter hogwash," wrote Friedman. "The only entities who can have responsibilities are individuals; a business cannot have responsibilities. So the question is, do corporate executives, provided they stay within the law, have responsibilities in their business activities other than to make as much money for their stockholders as possible? And my answer to that is, no, they do not."23
This view has been misleadingly criticized as endorsing roguish corporate behavior in the service of enriching stockholders. Not true. Friedman acknowledges the ripple effects of a successful business such as increased community wealth, improved educational standards, and an improved environment-positive social consequences of business. He noted that when Henry Ford built the Model T, he realized that the long-term success of the automobile industry rested with creating a mass market for his products. Committed to making his new car affordable to even his own workers, Ford Motor paid wages twice the going rate. Although he was viciously criticized by the business community for such "generosity" and successfully sued by outraged stockholders, Ford proved prescient. He made enormous profits, the industry moved to his standards, and the automobile was transformed from a luxury to an affordable staple.24
Key to Friedman's beliefs-and integral to the concept of the integrity premium-is that doing good can add competitive value to products or services and should not merely reflect the idiosyncrasies of corporate executives. Otherwise it is mere executive vanity, an abrogation of responsibility in a public company. Friedman once described oil companies' television ads as "turning his stomach" for making it seem that their purpose was to preserve the environment. However, he noted that he would probably sue if they did not engage in such "nonsense" because otherwise they would endanger their competitiveness: Friedman makes the point that companies must profess social responsibility to appeal to the public-at-large, keep regulators at bay, and thus ensure profits.25
But Friedman goes beyond endorsing pure image marketing. He noted that if an energy company can demonstrate that the controversy surrounding the release of industrial effluents makes it difficult to recruit and retain employees, or offers the prospect of adverse publicity or litigation, then voluntary reduction or clean-up of the effluent makes business and ethical sense. If it could mitigate adverse consequences by modifying environmental practices, then it is compelled to act in its stakeholders' best interest by doing so. This linkage of social marketing to intrinsic product value offers the classic win-win scenario preached by ethical investing advocates.
Consumers are willing to pay extra for a Mercedes automobile or a Le Tourneau watch because its brand image-premium quality-is reflected in its performance. Many socially responsible icons, from Odwalla to Ben & Jerry's, continue to flounder because they have not delivered on their promise of integrity of operations and product. By becoming vehicles for the ambiguous and idiosyncratic social goals of their founders, they have frequently neglected their own stakeholders, particularly customers. That's a prescription for disaster.
Making Ethics Pay
Preaching is the easy part. How can companies-New Age entrepreneurs and established businesses alike-implement measures that will burnish the companies' image and their responsiveness to stakeholders? I suggest what I call the "ABC's of Ethical Business": Accountability, Basic stakeholder relations, and company Character.
Accountability is the internal system of checks and balances-what business ethicists have come to call "transparency." For companies to move from eager idealists to mature corporations that can weather the storms of economic uncertainty and competition, it is essential that they regularly assess their performance against a broad range of standards and not just financial criteria.
Consider the impact if consistent information on the social and financial behavior of public corporations were mandated to be provided by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or the Securities and Exchange Commission. The SEC is currently in the midst of a massive revision in regulations concerning the sale of securities to the public. Corporations might be required to report on a range of industry-specific nonfinancial measures such as environmental compliance and compensation standards. For instance, companies might be required to disclose the factors on which incentive compensation is based, how they are weighted, and what percentage of total compensation consists of incentive bonuses for top management. As a result, competing stakeholders, including investors and employees, would have a larger stake in the future of their company without threatening top management's ability to remain nimble. If experience is a guide, customers and workers pay back this commitment to empowerment with increased loyalty, further burnishing the company's brand identity. Transparency could be a part of the Annual Report or a supplemental Social Report instead of being buried in the Shareholder Proxy Statement, which almost no one reads.
The Association for Investment Management and Research, a professional group of investment advisers, annually presents Excellence for Corporate Reporting awards. This is an attempt to encourage companies to disclose more than the bare bones required in financial reporting. Winners have included social investment favorites such as Cummins Engines, Wal-Mart, and Schering-Plough, as well as companies involved in oil (Ashland Oil, Chevron, Mobil, Occidental Petroleum, Phillips Petroleum), mining (Placer Dome), forest products (Boise Cascade), waste management (Browning-Ferris Industries) and chemicals (Dexter). Many of these firms are anathema to "socially responsible" investors who use litmus-test social criteria.
In recent years, rudimentary guidelines have evolved to measure social and environmental performance, including the CERES Principles, the chemical industry's Responsible Care, the Caux Principles, social responsibility issues in the TIAA-CREF Policy Statement on Corporate Governance, European Union Eco-Management and Audit Regulations, and ISO-14001.
Since ethics are not clear cut-this is the land of grays-it's critical that companies install internal mechanisms (boards, ethics officers, hot lines, and the like) to constantly assess problems. Companies are finding it prudent to appoint ethics officers and institute social and environmental reviews, if for no other reason than to protect themselves against liability concerns, which have increased significantly with the extension of the Sentencing Guidelines to organizations. The California Pension fund investment system (CalPERS), holding more than $100 billion in assets, is now demanding that companies with which it invests meet certain minimum standards of corporate governance.
By this measure alone, Odwalla would not have passed muster, since its board is composed almost entirely of business friends of founder Steltenpohl. For all its socially responsible rhetoric, Odwalla never put in place oversight -social reviews, hotlines, ombudsmen. The bottom-line reality is that companies cannot wait to screw up to address accountability. Nothing is more revealing of the good intentions of executives than their willingness to put the broader interests of the company ahead of their own vanity. That means putting in place limits on their own power, from strong internal ethics monitoring to independent boards.
Basic Stakeholder Relations means a move away from trendy social litmus tests to measures of actual impact on stakeholders. Archie Carroll, Professor of Business Ethics at the University of Georgia, laid out this thesis brilliantly in 1991 with his "pyramid of social responsibility."26 According to Carroll, the base of the pyramid is financial stability: the fundamental responsibility of a corporation-it's very reason for existence-is to be profitable. That profitability, he contends, rests on a corporationís ability to satisfy the sometimes competing demands of its stakeholders, from customers to employees to shareholders.
The next layer of the pyramid is legal compliance. But modern corporations, if they hope to survive in a world of ever-fiercer competition and shrinking profit margins, need to focus on how they can enhance their brand identity so as to inflate their profit margin. That comes through ethical actions beyond mere legal compliance-the kind Friedman suggests he would expect a company to take to embellish its reputation and competitiveness.
These three dimensions-economic, legal, and ethical-provide a base of savvy management that makes the peak of the pyramid possible: philanthropy. Even charity is dominated by strategic and brand-building considerations. Curtis Weeden, former Vice President for Philanthropy at Johnson and Johnson, contends in his book Corporate Social Investing that corporate philanthropy is an oxymoron. Almost none of it represents a quiet, no-strings-attached act of conscience. Rather, it serves to support corporate goals through other means. In the case of self-styled, socially responsible firms, it also embellishes their reputation and inflates the integrity premium-the price they can charge for their products.
As Carroll makes clear, social responsibility does not begin with good intentions but with stakeholder actions. This challenges the rhetoric of the social investment community that a companyís ethics are measured by its intentions and a rhetorical commitment to a vague, supposedly ìprogressive" social agenda. This belies the complexity of business and mocks the fundamental responsibility of business to create needed products and services. Companies need to be held accountable for product quality, treatment of employees, vendor relations, and their environmental impact as well as their impact on those who invest money in the company through stock purchases.
In other words, socially responsible business is serious business. Corporations perceived as ideological or cultural friends, as many have viewed Odwalla, should not be given a get-out-of-jail-free card purely for their inspired social rhetoric. And more traditional companies engaged in complex technologies such as natural resources, bio-engineering, or heavy manufacturing-the kind of industries that create high-paying jobs with substantial community benefits-should not be dismissed because they do not play the rhetoric game. These issues are gray, not black and white.
It's critical to move beyond the good/bad paradigm when judging corporations. We need to cultivate a level informational playing field so open debate and evaluation is possible. Social researchers or company executives who rely on simplistic positive/negative social screens belie the moral and practical complexity of the real world. In the absence of clear rationale, such criteria reflect not ethics but sentiment.
Character of management is the intangible that ultimately defines the ethics of a corporation. Ethics is not about identifying right from wrong-choices are rarely so clear-but making informed choices in morally ambiguous situations. No compliance standard, corporate board oversight committee, or internal ethical review can compensate for a rupture in personal ethics.
We live in a time when business transgressions inevitably find their way onto the pages of The Wall Street Journal. Companies are composed of human beings who are far from perfect; mistakes are built into life. A corporation might better be thought of as a extended family, at times a dysfunctional family, made up of stakeholders with competing and frequently conflicting interests. Although it may draw moral legitimacy from acts of social campaigning and philanthropy, it is defined by its operational ethic reaffirmed by the individuals in charge of executing the company's vision. Nothing reveals that more starkly than senior management's response to inevitable corporate miscues.
Mistakes are built into life; character is defined in the breach. There is no such thing as "business ethics," only ethics of individual business men and women.
Return to Top of Page
1 Pam Belluck, "Juice Maker Pleads Guilty and Pays $1.5 million in Fatal Poising Case." New York Times, July 24, 1998.
2 "Rotten fruit, black crud and the end of Odwalla." Seattle Times editorial, January 16, 1998.
3 "Doing Due Diligence Domestically." Worth, May 1995.
4 Mathew W. Patsky, Kim Galle & Patricia Negron, "Healthy Returns: How Healthier Lifestyles Create Investment Opportunities." Adams, Harkness & Hill, Inc., September 23, 1996.
5 See K.M. Hearit, "Mistakes Were Made: Organizations, Apologia, and Crises of Social Legitimacy." Communication Studies, 46, Spring 1995, 1-13; W. L. Benoit & J.J. Lindsey, "Argument Strategies: Antidote to Tylenolís Poisoned Image." Journal of the American Forensic Association, 23, Spring 1995, 136-146.
6 S. Russell, "Odwalla Disputes Critical FDA Probe; Agency Found "Inadequate Testing." San Francisco Chronicle, November 26, 1996, B2.
7 Chris Gallagher, "Odwalla was Responsible in Wake of E. coli Tragedy," Seattle Times, February 4, 1998.
8 "Handling a Food Borne Crisis: Odwalla Case Provides Insight and Wake-Up Call to the Natural Foods Industry," Natural Foods Merchandiser, July 1997.
9 Amy Domini letter to the Social Investment Forum e-mail list, January 5, 1998.
10 K. Howe, "Odwalla Gets High Marks for Concern." San Francisco Chronicle, November 2, 1996, D.1; Edleman was awarded a Silver Anvil and Best of Show by the Public Relations Society of America in 1997 for handling the Odwalla crisis.
11 "Disaster Strikes: Crisis Management Communication at Odwalla, Inc." Feedback, Fall 1998, 8-17.
12 Christopher Drew & Pam Belluck, "Deadly Bacteria a New Threat to Fruit and Produce in the U.S.: Odwalla-A Costly Strategy, a Slump in Sales." New York Times, January 4, 1998, 1, 13.
13 Tim Klass, "Odwalla Aware of E-coli Before Outbreak: Court Papers Show Negligence." Associated Press, December 12, 1997.
14 This account is drawn from court documents summarized in part in the Drew & Belluck article.
15 Drew & Belluck.
16 Ed Welles, "Ben's Big Flop, Inc., September 1998.
17 Interview with the author, June 1994.
18 See King County Superior Court: Beverly vs. Odwalla 97-2-28347-7 and Berman vs. Odwalla 97-2-23109-6; US District Court Dimock vs. Odwalla C97-1405D, and Hiatt vs. Odwalla C97-1343WD.
19 George Raine, "Army Rejected Odwalla Before E Coli Outbreak." San Francisco Examiner, April 8, 1998.
20 Four of the five children, who ranged in age from four to seven, suffered severe blood and kidney damage which doctors believe is permanent.
21 "E. coli Claims Resolved: Odwalla to Pay Families of Poisoned Children." Dallas Morning News, May 27, 1998.
22 "Milton Friedman Responds." Business & Society Review, 5, 1984.
24 Ford raised the wages and reduced workers' hours while increasing production and cutting the price of the Model T from $950 to $290. Alan Brinkley, Richard N. Current, Frank Friedel & J. Harry Williams, American History: A Survey. Vol. 1, 8th Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991, 515-516.
25 "Milton Friedman Responds." Business & Society, 5, Spring 1976.
26 A. B. Carroll, ìThe Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders." Business Horizons, July/August 1991
Odwalla Case Study
...Vivian Delisle Strategy Consultants……………. Odwalla Inc.: Apple Juice E-Coli Outbreak by Managing Post Crisis Tradedgy Course OL690: Corporate Social Responsibility Instructor: Mike Davis Date: October 30, 2012 Introduction: Odwalla juice company has a devastating tradedgy occur, the year was 1996 and a young girl died and at least 70 others were injured from drinking their apple juice tainted with a poisonous bacteria. The company pleaded guilty to criminal charges for violating FDA safety laws and had to pay $1.5 million in fines. Odwalla was considered a great socially responsible company with an ethical conscious so you have to ask what happened? Analysis: Odwalla is a juice company that had produced unpasteurized and fresh premium juices. The executives in the company boasted of their commitment to society and had positioned the company as a New Age brand of juice. People paid more for this juice as compared to the usual store brands or Motts, ect… The company was in business for 20 years before the outbreak. The juice was tainted with E. coli 0157:H7 bateria. Odwalla had a great maketing campaign that focused on its social responsibility that was believed by their stakeholders; their employees, creditors, and customers all believed Odwalla was a great company. When the crisis hit Odwalla removed the product but had a hard time swalling the “responsibility” pill. Even though Odwalla continued to improve their manufacturing processes they......
Words: 765 - Pages: 4
Odwalla, Inc. Case Study
...Odwalla, Inc. case study Odwalla which is a company making fresh juices and juice blends was founded in 1980 by three musicians with $200 investment. They got their inspiration from a book "100 Businesses You Can Start for Under $100" during a visit to a bookstore. The founders started to squeeze and bottle the juice, and delivered to stores and restaurants. They collected fund to expand their business, and named their business. After several different juice operations joined Odwalla within 10 years, the company grew rapidly with various products, but facing more challenges. Base on the large demand of orange juice, Odwalla always had sourcing problems of best oranges; and also, the shelf life of orange juice was a big problem and cost more expense of the company. In the winter of 1990- 1991, Odwalla almost broke down because of financial problems. In the meantime, a former investment banker- Stephen Williamson invested in Odwalla, and became the CEO of the company. His unique version made an important change in the company’s development, and got Odwalla out of this crisis, even grew stronger in the following years. There was a high growth of the company in to nationwide during the year from 1993 to 1996 by purchasing several other companies in different states, diversifying product, and adding more nutrients. Another factor was that Odwalla’s product display in retail stores gave customers a unique and bright view. Odwalla became the leader in the beverage industry......
Words: 604 - Pages: 3
...University of Phoenix Material Case Study Analysis Paper Prepare a 1,400 to 1,750-word case study analysis paper based on the University of Phoenix Material, “Case Study for Student Analysis,” located in Week Two of the COMM/215 page. Below is a detailed description explaining how to prepare a case study analysis paper. _____________________________________________________________________________ Typically written in narrative form, a case sets forth, in a factual manner, the events and organizational circumstances surrounding a particular managerial situation. Placing the reader at the scene of the action, the real events presented provide an opportunity to help evaluate alternative courses of action. Case analysis is used in academics to help you demonstrate your ability to evaluate situations critically, to apply concepts you have learned in a class, to solve problems, and to communicate your findings and conclusions. The purpose of this exercise is to introduce you to case studies and the analysis process, and to a proper format for writing the case study analysis report. Try not to worry about trying to find the "right answer" to a case. Usually, there is no single right answer. Most cases are intentionally ambiguous and can be viewed from many different perspectives. Several feasible solutions are usually available to any give case. The best solution is the one you can best support with thoughtful analysis, logical arguments, and substantiating evidence from......
Words: 539 - Pages: 3
Case Study Case Study Case Study
...This case study is an excellent example of how different types of parties can be brought together in a large scale transaction and how the original energy of those early meetings can be lost over time. I imagine that when Anthony Athanas was purchasing those old piers back in the 1960s many, if not all, of his colleagues, friends, and family members told him that he was off his rocker. I’m sure Athanas was looking at this land as his family’s ticket to financial prosperity and somewhat of a legacy that he could leave to his descendants for years and years to come. One of the items I wish the case would have divulged is the amount of money that Athanas had invested in the properties. For me this information would have given an insight to his net worth and how much he had riding on this investment. I assume it was substantial given his actions later in the process. Twenty years later Athanas’ dreams came true and all those naysayers were more than likely green with envy. The amount of pride Athanas’ had in his investment at that moment had to have been insurmountable. Being approached by a big time real estate development company and their extremely wealthy client, Hyatt Corporation, must have made Athanas feel larger than life and made him feel like something he isn’t, which is a developer himself. The case doesn’t give much insight into whether Athanas had any representation or anyone consulting him throughout the process. From the beginning, I saw this as matchup...
Words: 1190 - Pages: 5
...Yin (2005) suggested that researchers should decide whether to do single-case or multiple-case studies and chose to keep the case holistic or have embedded sub-cases. This two-by-two combination can produce four basic designs for case studies. When selecting a case for a case study, researchers often use information-oriented sampling , as opposed to random sampling . This is because an average case is often not the richest in information. Extreme or atypical cases reveal more information because they activate more basic mechanisms and more actors in the situation studied. In addition, from both an understanding-oriented and an action-oriented perspective, it is often more important to clarify the deeper causes behind a given problem and its consequences than to describe the symptoms of the problem and how frequently they occur. Random samples emphasizing representativeness will seldom be able to produce this kind of insight; it is more appropriate to select some few cases chosen for their validity. But this isnt always the case. Three types of information-oriented cases may be distinguished: Extreme or deviant cases Critical cases Paradigmatic cases. Critical case A critical case can be defined as having strategic importance in relation to the general problem. For example, an occupational medicine clinic wanted to investigate whether people working with organic solvents suffered brain damage. Instead of choosing a representative sample among all those......
Words: 1244 - Pages: 5
...1. ------------------------------------------------- Determine the main objective of the case study. You may be writing a case study to fulfill an academic requirement or to help solve problems in real-life situations. An academic assignment typically will come with a specific objective and instructions, whereas a professional assignment might require you to define the objective. ------------------------------------------------- Ad 2. ------------------------------------------------- 2 ------------------------------------------------- Select the best approach. * Choose an analytical approach to increase awareness. In the preliminary stages of solving management problems, an analytical case study might best meet the goal of alerting upper management to core facts and issues. An analytical case study primarily focuses on what has occurred and why. * Select a problem-solving approach to pinpoint and solve major issues. If the goal is to make solution recommendations, write a problem-solving case study that clearly outlines problems and solutions. 1. ------------------------------------------------- 3 ------------------------------------------------- Conduct research for your case study. Examine the facts, dynamics, communications and all relevant aspects of the particular situation. Research might involve interviewing people in an organization, reviewing written documents or looking up relevant statistics. Method 2 of 5: Set the Scope for Readers...
Words: 487 - Pages: 2
...Select a case study from the University of Phoenix Material: Young and Middle Adulthood Case Studies located on the student website. Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper describing the influence the experiences have made on the person’s development. Address the following in your paper: Discuss the family, social, and intimate relationships of the person in the case study. Identify any role changes that have occurred. Explain the immediate and future effect of healthy or unhealthy habits practiced by this person. Include at least two peer-reviewed resources. Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines. University of Phoenix Material Young and Middle Adulthood Case Studies Read the following case studies in order to complete the Week Three Individual Assignment. Case Study 1: Jackson Jackson is a 25-year old male who has recently been admitted to a substance abuse program in Chicago, Illinois. He has been arrested several times for possession of a controlled substance but has not served any time in jail. He grew up in a single-parent household with his mother, Tina. Tina, 45, is employed as a high school teacher; his biological father is not involved in his life. Tina’s boyfriend, Michael, often attempts to serve as a father figure to Jackson. Jackson went to college immediately after high school, focused on a degree in chemistry. In high school, he was a good student who earned A’s and B’s in most courses. After a car accident, a slight head......
Words: 414 - Pages: 2
...A Case Study by any Other Name Cathy Foster Liberty University A Case Study by any other Name Researchers have different methods of observing their subjects. Among the most popular is the case study. Case studies are used a lot in psychology and one of the most famous psychologists that used case studies to detail the private lives of his patients was Sigmund Freud. What is a Case Study? “A case study is an observational method that provides a description of an individual” (Cozby & Bates, 2012). During a case study the individual is usually a person however that’s not always the situation. The case study can also be a setting, which can include a school, business, or neighborhood. A naturalistic observational study can sometimes be called a case study and these two studies can overlap (Cozby & Bates, 2012). Researchers report information from the individual or other situation, which is from a “real-life context and is in a truthful and unbiased manner” (Amerson, 2011). What are some Reasons for Using a Case Study Approach? There are different types of case studies. One reason to use a case study is when a researcher needs to explain the life of an individual. When an important historical figure’s life needs explaining this is called psychobiography (Cozby & Bates, 2012). The case study approach help answer the “how”, “what”, and “why” questions (Crowe, 2011). What are Some Advantages and Disadvantages to the Case Study Approach? Some......
Words: 548 - Pages: 3
...The Case Study Approach Linda P. Williams Liberty University Online Author Note Linda P. Williams, Department of Psychology, Liberty University Online Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Linda P. Williams, Department of Psychology, Liberty University Online, 1971 University Blvd, Lynchburg, VA 24515, E-mail: email@example.com The Case Study Approach Introduction At some point during the pursuit of a degree psychology, the time comes when a student must learn various research techniques. One of the many approaches is case study, which this paper will focus on. Areas of discussion include reasons for using a case study, advantages/disadvantages to the approach, and ways acquire information to perform a case study. The essence of a case study A case study is used to offer a mental accounting of a person, school, neighborhood, business, or group of individuals over the course of time, way of research. It is sometimes referred to as naturalistic observation, but does not always follow the same protocol. Mental accounting is done by means of observation of various behavior or mind sets operating in their natural environment. This is noteworthy, especially when participants have a distinct disorder worthy of being studied to further the cause of research and development. Depending on the purpose of the investigation, the case study may present the individual’s history, symptoms, characteristic behaviors, reactions to......
Words: 671 - Pages: 3
Coca-Cola Case Study
...Coca-Cola’s globalization and its main strategies by Olga Skuratovska Management 502 (MGT502) Professor Claudia J.Ford October 15, 2014 Olga Skuratovska Skuratovska1 Professor Claudia J.Ford Management 502 (MGT502) October 15, 2014 Introduction For my business case study research paper I chose the Coca-Cola Company. I went through a lot of information about the company, I learned the company’s history and analyzed their main strategies that made Coca-Cola one of the most successful and recognized beverage company in the world. “The Coca-Cola Company, founded in 1886, is the world leading manufacturer, marketer and distributor of non-alcoholic beverage concentrates and syrups. It currently operates in over 200 countries worldwide and is most famous for the innovative soft drink, ‘Coca-Cola’, but can now boast in the region of 230 different brands (www.coca-cola.com). Its headquarters are in Atlanta, Georgia. Its subsidiaries employ nearly 30,000 people around the world. 70% of the company volume and 80% of the company profit come from outside the United States. It is one of the most visible companies in the world. Their Coca-Cola product is now available all over the world and has resulted in the drink becoming the world’s...
Words: 1725 - Pages: 7
Analysis of the Case of Odwalla
...Customers found that the productions which from Odwalla are not safe, they may stop buying them which may cause the low sales. As another stakeholder in this case, the shareholder of Odwalla should make efficient decision which could get the company out of the trouble. I think what they should do is to recall the product from the stores which they supplied to. Also, providing some safety solutions which would be more effective. Another thing which they could do is to reform the company in terms of company’s regulation, brand name and the slogans which they used in their advertisement previously. By doing these, they would get a both short-term and long-term benefit. If I were the CEO this company, I would definitely recall the product as well. Although e-coli is rare, when it happens it will make bad effects on people with weak immune systems. Deciding to recall the product and make immediate improvement is more important for both sides of us and customers. We should make more good changes on the product which may increase the credibility of our company. It will uphold his fiduciary responsibility to Odwalla’s owners, and also upholds the rights of costomers. Thinking that if the CEO did not decide to recall the product, it may cause many bad influence. There would be a lawsuits waiting for Odwalla and the stock may go down. The CEO acted appropriately and with ethics which may earn the credibility and the stock may go up....
Words: 252 - Pages: 2
...Case Study Complete Case History The patient in this case study reports being ‘sick with flu’ for 8 days. She has been vomiting, and cannot keep any liquids or food down. She also reports that she has been using antacids to help calm the nausea. After fainting at home, she was taken to the local hospital, severely dehydrated. Upon looking at her arterial blood gas result, it would appear that this patient would be suffering from metabolic alkalosis. This patient’s pH is greater than 7.45 (normal: 7.35-7.45) and her bicarbonate (HCO3) is greater than 26 (normal 22-26). Blood gases indicate that case study patient is suffering from hypochloremic metabolic alkalosis. Focused Assessment The case study patient reports being “sick with flu” for eight days. She reports vomiting several times a day and taking more the recommended dose of antacids. She reports that she fainted today at home and came to the hospital. The case study patient reports that this all started approximately eight days ago. The case study patient also reported taking excess amounts of antacids. Ingesting large amounts of this medication can cause metabolic alkalosis. When antacids are taken in large doses, the ions are unable to bind, and therefor the bicarbonate is reabsorbed and causes alkalosis (Lehne, 2013). Renal and Respiratory systems response Hypochloremic Metabolic alkalosis occurs when there is an acid loss due to prolonged vomiting which causes a decrease in the extracellular...
Words: 289 - Pages: 2
...Case studies Name: Tutor: Course: Institution: Date: Flying to the Auto Bailout on a Private Jet Basic problems In this case study, there is wastage of resources. The CEOs of the nation's three largest automobiles uses private jets to attend the corporate public relations congress. This is wastage of resources since they are using private jets to travel when their companies are struggling to stay afloat. Ignorance is another basic problem evident in this case study. These CEOs are very ignorant. They attend the corporate public relation congress in Washington unprepared and thus appear to know nothing about their problems. The three companies, GM, Ford and Chrysler, lack the concepts of public relations. The main issues American economy is melting down. Most of the workers are losing their jobs since the companies cannot handle many workers anymore. The companies have got inadequate cash. Bankruptcy is another main issue experienced in this case study. The General Motors Company and the Chrysler can no longer pay their debts. Key decisions * According to the case study, the leaders have to come up with a new public relations strategy. * The CEOs should correct any mistakes they have made before such as using private jets to travel. * Introduce innovation in products * The auto industry of the US should promote its products. * Ensure transparency in business operations. SWOT analysis Strengths * Availability of resources for the......
Words: 657 - Pages: 3
...ASSIGNMENT GUIDANCE – NRSG258 ASSESSMENT 1: CASE STUDY Dear students here are some guidelines to assist you in writing Assessment 1: Case Study. If, after reading through these, you still have questions please post on the relevant forum. If you are still unsure then please contact your campus specific lecturer to arrange to discuss your assignment. We ask that you bring these guidelines to any meeting and highlight the areas about which you are still unsure. In this case study you do not need an introduction or conclusion for this case study of 1500 WORDS ± 10% due by midnight 8th April Turnitin. Just answer the questions. Turnitin is located in your campus specific block. Although we suggest you do your background reading in the current textbooks for basic information, the case study also requires you to find current literature/research/articles to support your discussion throughout the case study. Do NOT use Better Health Channel, WedMed, dictionaries, encyclopaedias etc. These are NOT suitable academic sources. If you use these you will not meet the criteria for this question and you will lose marks. You must follow the APA referencing format as directed by ACU in your case study and in your reference list. The Library website has examples of how to do this referencing and you can find the correct format at the end of your lectures and tutorials as well as in the free Student Study Guide. This essay should have approximately 10 relevant sources.......
Words: 1111 - Pages: 5
Odwalla Case Analysis
...Introduction According to the case study, Odwalla Juice Company was founded in 1980 when three musicians in an effort to raise money to fund music school programs, had the idea of selling freshly squeezed juice to small businesses within their immediate community. The trio invested $200 in juicing equipment and started a “fresh juice revolution”, which was intended to meet the growing demand for organic foods & beverages by consumers across the country. The company started relatively small with the founders personally squeezing, packaging and transporting these juices to local restaurants that existed in their community. However the company experienced rapid growth in the early 90’s and by 1995 it has increased its product line and expanded operations well beyond the local market. Odwalla was able to captivate consumers through the creativity of the company’s founders who were also very passionate about social responsibility and the need to ensure the health and wellbeing of the community. This philosophy was also reflected in the company’s core values and company vision which read “Odwalla, a breath of fresh intoxicating rhythm, living flavor, soil to soul, people to planet, nourishing the body whole.” The company’s core values also touted a philosophy or honesty, integrity, personal responsibility and environmental awareness, just to name a few. In an attempt to effectively meet the needs of its customer base, the company leadership employed a business model that......
Words: 2119 - Pages: 9