There was a time when it was believed that boys and girls should be taught in separate institutions. In ancient gurukuls, there were only boys who were given education then. In spite of this, women generally had good education in ancient India.
After Independence, several education commissions and committees were set up. They generally advocated co-education in schools up to 10+2 level and separate education for boys and girls at the university level till graduation. This policy is now by and large being followed in our country. There is, however, co-education again at post-graduation level.
Some people believe that co-education should not be there. In their opinion this can lead to attraction between boys and girls which are neither good for their health, nor character, nor studies. Some other people are of the view that co-education can bring about a healthy competition between boys and girls and thus it can be of mutual benefit to both sexes. It can mean better discipline since in the presence of girls the boys will not talk irrelevantly or obscenely in the class.
The most potent argument advanced by co-education lovers is that it can help both boys and girls in the development of their personality. They can come out of their enclosed shell-like personality and get rid of their unwarranted hesitation and shyness.
This can make boys and girls more expressive, progressive and forward in outlook and attitude to life which can be of great advantage to both sexes. It must, however, be noted that some reservations are also there and even in a country like England, exclusive schools for girls are now being set up.
Single-Sex Education and Co-ed Education Essay
1059 Words5 Pages
Single-Sex Education and Coed Education.
The single-sex format creates opportunities that do not exist in the coed classroom. (Edison 1) Researchers are unaware that both genders brains function differently. This lack of knowledge may be why the real truth about single-sex education being more efficient than co-ed education has not been discovered. Some say single-sex education may be the key for a brighter generation. It shows to improve test score dramatically. The number of public schools experimenting with single sex classes is now reported to be more than 350. (Silva 130) Some research also shows that single-sex classes have a more welcoming atmosphere. Single-sex education improves grades while coed educations keep an average pace.…show more content…
Not only is Single-sex schools a benefit for student but it’s also a benefit for teachers. Single-sex schooling allows teachers to tailor their teaching style to the boys and facilitate more rounded educational experience.(Mullins 124) Teachers need to encourage girls while boys need a reality check But some people disagree saying single-sex education is discriminating and unrealistic.
Proponents of coeducation argue that mixed education is more in keeping with the mores of modern western society, and that children from co-ed schools are better adjusted. (Mullins121) For a sensitive boy or an assertive girl, the teaching style promoted by advocates of single-sex education could be ineffective. (Stanberry, 2) “Boys and girls can learn from each other in a classroom. It is important to learn how to relate to one another. “I think all of us should be together as a team, and it should not matter if you are a boy or girl. (Survor and Egna 7) Opposers say districts and schools considering single-sex education should be wary of other practical barriers. (Silva 132) most likely they will try and stop the separation of genders. Researchers suggest that some sex-segregation proponents are manipulating school boards and segregated education. This unawareness in turn, often causes schools to rely on brain research. (Cantalupo 730) It seems beyond dispute that boys and girls learn at different paces and in different ways. According to a