Self Other And Social Contexts Assignment Management

What is the purpose of public education in a democracy? Tyack 1966 answers this question with a seminal piece on the history of public education. Barber 1992 moves from the historical rationale for public education—creating a civil society—to examine the contradictions and challenges of this education goal in a contemporary democracy filled with consumerism and cynicism. Fuhrman and Lazerson 2005 provides a contemporary context to assess the historical arguments for devising and sustaining a public school system as an engine for producing a civil and free society. For readers interested in philosophical debates and policy dilemmas, Gutmann 1999 underscores the tensions between liberty and civility, the central tenets of a democracy, and the challenges facing educators as efforts are made to reconcile and balance these tensions. Ravitch and Viteritti 2001 complements these works by presenting an edited volume with chapters that span multiple disciplinary lenses through which to consider the power and limitations of public education in a democratic state. How do you apply the principles of democratic education to the formation of student-citizens? Readers interested in this question will find thoughtful analyses and substantive models in Westheimer and Kahne 2004, related to elementary and secondary contexts, and should refer to Colby, et al. 2003 for a robust discussion of civic engagement in higher education programs and policies. Skocpol, et al. 1999 provides a provocative, deeply theoretical perspective on civic engagement.

  • Barber, Benjamin R. 1992. An aristocracy of everyone: The politics of education and the future of America. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.

    E-mail Citation »

    A vision of education as the fount and mainstay of a democratic society. Incorporates themes relating to postmodernism, conservative excess, and community service.

  • Colby, Anne, Thomas Ehrlich, Elizabeth Beaumont, and Jason Stephens. 2003. Educating citizens: Preparing America’s undergraduates for lives of moral and civic responsibility. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    E-mail Citation »

    Describes how some colleges are attempting to shape the moral and civic development of students, explains the nature of this development, articulates the challenges faced in the process, and offers recommendations for future efforts.

  • Fuhrman, Susan, and Marvin Lazerson, eds. 2005. The public schools. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.

    E-mail Citation »

    A compilation of essays covering historical, theoretical, political, and pragmatic topics related to democracy and the American public school. Provides a historical frame of reference and discusses matters of citizenship and mechanisms for enhancing democracy through education.

  • Gutmann, Amy. 1999. Democratic education. Rev. ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.

    E-mail Citation »

    Defends the cultivation of deliberative skills and virtues necessary for civic education and advocates the principle of shared educational authority among parents, citizens, and educators.

  • Ravitch, Diane, and Joseph P. Viteritti, eds. 2001. Making good citizens: Education and civil society. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.

    E-mail Citation »

    This collection of work targets politics, values, and religion as topics intrinsic to the connection between education and civil society. Includes multidisciplinary perspectives from history, psychology, philosophy, political science, and law.

  • Skocpol, Theda, and Morris P. Fiorina, eds. 1999. Civic engagement in American democracy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    E-mail Citation »

    A compendium of predominantly institutionalist and rational-choice theoretical perspectives on the roots of civic engagement, long-term changes in civic activity, and the need for a more critical analysis of newer forms of civic activism.

  • Tyack, David. 1966. Forming the national character. Harvard Educational Review 36.1: 29–41.

    E-mail Citation »

    A historical account of how Jefferson, Rush, and Webster formulated educational theories pertaining to the republicanization of the young nation.

  • Westheimer, Joel, and Joseph J. Kahne. 2004. What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal 41.2: 237–269.

    DOI: 10.3102/00028312041002237E-mail Citation »

    This article unpacks the concept of good citizenship by drawing on a two-year study of democratic educational programs while exploring the political ramifications of such programs.

  • 1.

    Hoda, R., Noble, J., Marshall, S.: Agile project management. In: New Zealand Computer Science Research Student Conference, vol. 6, pp. 218–221 (2008)Google Scholar

  • 2.

    Manifesto for agile software development (2001). Accessed 7 Jan 2017

  • 3.

    Hoda, R., Noble, J., Marshall, S.: Developing a grounded theory to explain the practices of self-organizing Agile teams. Empirical Softw. Eng. 17(6), 609–639 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 4.

    Hoda, R., Murugesan, L.K.: Multi-level agile project management challenges: a self-organizing team perspective. J. Syst. Softw. 117, 245–257 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 5.

    Pinto, J.K., Slevin, D.P.: Critical success factors across the project life cycle. Proj. Manage. J. 19(3), 67–75 (1988)Google Scholar

  • 6.

    Acuna, S.T., Juristo, N., Moreno, A.M.: Emphasizing human capabilities in software development. IEEE Softw. 23(2), 94–101 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 7.

    Deemer, P., Benefield, G., Larman, C., Vodde, B.: A lightweight guide to the theory and practice of scrum. Version 2 (2012)Google Scholar

  • 8.

    Hoda, R., Noble, J.: Becoming agile: a grounded theory of agile transitions in practice. In: IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2017) (2017)Google Scholar

  • 9.

    Crowston, K., Li, Q., Wei, K., Eseryel, U.Y., Howison, J.: Self-organization of teams for free/libre open source software development. Inf. Softw. Technol. 49(6), 564–575 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 10.

    Kalliamvakou, E., Damian, D., Blincoe, K., Singer, L., German, D.M.: Open source-style collaborative development practices in commercial projects using github. In: Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Software Engineering, vol. 1, pp. 574–585. IEEE Press (2015)Google Scholar

  • 11.

    Glaser, B.G.: Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis: Emergence vs. Forcing. Sociology Press, Mill Valley (1992)Google Scholar

  • 12.

    Glaser, B.G.: Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Sociology Pr., Mill Valley (1978)Google Scholar

  • 13.

    Myers, M.D.: Qualitative research in information systems. Manage. Inf. Syst. Q. 21(2), 241–242 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 14.

    Stol, K.J., Ralph, P., Fitzgerald, B.: Grounded theory in software engineering research: a critical review and guidelines. In: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 120–131. ACM (2016)Google Scholar

  • 15.

    Hoda, R., Noble, J., Marshall, S.: Self-organizing roles on agile software development teams. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 39(3), 422–444 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 16.

    Adolph, S., Kruchten, P., Hall, W.: Reconciling perspectives: a grounded theory of how people manage the process of software development. J. Syst. Softw. 85(6), 1269–1286 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 17.

    Stray, V., Sjøberg, D.I., Dybå, T.: The daily stand-up meeting: a grounded theory study. J. Syst. Softw. 114, 101–124 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 0 thoughts on “Self Other And Social Contexts Assignment Management

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *